Neurosciences of Consciousness

we have a million examples of Neurosciences of Consciousness where if you damage the brain, that changes the person, it changes their conscious state. There’s this irrevocable relationship between the biology and conscious state

Neurosciences of Consciousness

Correlated Neurosciences of Consciousness

People are searching for the neural correlates of Neurosciences of Consciousness, cause we say hey, this set of Christmas tree lights; lights up when you’re conscious of this or that, but it still leaves us feeling quite empty as far as why it feels that way. The fundamental philosophical question – can Christmas lights lighting up in the brain ever be about something or have a content feel to it as Neurosciences of Consciousness. First maybe limitation of my imagination, or secondly what it tells us is that you know.

materialism is sort of what’s taken for granted in the field, meaning that we can take all the pieces and parts of the brain and put them together in this vast complicated network and get Neurosciences of Consciousness. We don’t actually know for certain.

Lab Grown Consciousness

      Now, the reason neuroscientists generally subscribe to materialism, and the reason we go into lab every day and act as though it’s true, is because we have a million examples where if you damage the brain, that changes the person, it changes their conscious state. There’s this irrevocable relationship between the biology and Neurosciences of Consciousness state, but that doesn’t actually mean materialism has to be true. There are alternative theories that could be the case. We may or may not subscribe to these theories, but we can say agnostically, that it is perfectly possible.

Consciousness as CEO

Consciousness as CEO. Not bad; but to explain the inner subjective feeling of consciousness, this is not all encompassing. Brain science is hugely successful in explicating aspects of consciousness, but makes no progress in elucidating consciousness itself.

          In seeking new perspectives of consciousness, we have often learned about normal brain function from tragic cases of brain malfunction; deficits, defects, injuries. As per the concepts of an expert on the cognitive disabilities and congenital brain malformation; Warren Brown, Professor of Psychology.

Brain Function Vis-à-vis Consciousness

     As per the professor, consciousness is a mystery; but it’s not as great a mystery as some people make it out to be. Scientists think it is a phenomena. Our brain function – it’s emergent, in a sense from our brain function. You can see that in problems of brain disorder that reduce consciousness in some way.

So, your brain stems are damaged, you lose consciousness, hallucinogenic drugs had this massive impact on consciousness. Then, consciousness as a phenomena itself. There are starting to be some pretty good theories about how this might take place within the context of patterns of electrical activity, modulating over the service or in the cerebral cortex. Networks that form that are active for a moment and give us that moment of consciousness.

Consciousness, to the professor, has got to include working memory – that is those things that we hold in mind at the moment in order to manipulate them in some way, and so consciousness is something out here divorced from its engagement in regulation and manipulation and formulation of action in the world. So, we have to act and our consciousness allows us to.

Maybe even run a scenario of some possible action in the future while someone sitting and doing nothing. For that person, in the context, work with people without the major structure that interconnects the two cerebral hemispheres, the Corpus Coliseum. They have been born without that, so it’s a congenial abnormality.

         200 million neurons are just not there, the two hemispheres are not well connected. They can be in the normal range of tested intelligence, but they nevertheless have issues, and they have issues, for example, in the understanding of the second order meaning of language.

So, if use a metaphor, person without the Corpus Coliseum, understands the concrete part of the metaphor, but they may not understand the second level of meaning. They’re plenty of Neurosciences of Consciousness, plenty self-aware, but there’s a whole lot of stuff going on that would be part of the consciousness of somebody with a Corpus Coliseum, which might also involve some emotional engagement in the situation because of that, that they would not be a part of their consciousness.

Implications for Core Concept of Neurosciences of Consciousness

        What are the implications of that for the core concept of consciousness? Consciousness is a term we use to identify a sort of emergent conglomeration of all kinds of things that are particularly apparent and useful at the moment, and engage us.

You can take the word consciousness and put it out here in the abstract box, and then it becomes a problem. But if you break down the box and say, well, it’s not one thing, it’s a network of things, it’s a property that emerges out of a lot of things, it becomes a little less mysterious. Still mysterious, but a little less mysterious.

         The direct and consistent relationship between brain structure and mental capacity, especially in brain abnormalities. That’s why; neuroscience background is similar, so why people are more bothered when confronting consciousness? Is it because they desire existence beyond the physical, and therefore seek solace in consciousness? Perhaps we are impatient, but why does consciousness seem of a totally different category?

          Some scientist cannot remotely imagine how physical matter can become mentally aware. So, venturing from brain scientist, to a philosopher and theologian who believes that consciousness involved some kind of nonphysical aspect, or a nonphysical component. As per Professor of Divinity, Keith Ward; consciousness is the immediate awareness of objects and those objects could be physical objects.

If you’re looking at things that could be thoughts – thoughts are objects of consciousness. There is someone who is conscious of those objects, so you see, we have a subject being aware of various different sorts of objects. It’s like reality, saying what is reality? Well, you’re a bit stuck, because it’s so general.

Neurosciences of Brain Function

            Some cognitive psychologists would point to different brain systems that can be separated through injury or through artificial stimulations, and so, what you think is this unified whole, turns out not to be. But we are still learning that that’s true by being conscious of it. All knowledge begins with experience. That is with consciousness; that’s where it begins, and it can’t ever take you to a place which undermines consciousness itself.

If somebody comes up with a theory that shows that consciousness is an illusion, there’s something wrong with them, because against what are you measuring that illusion. Some people say consciousness is an illusion, others would say that at the very least, it’s not fundamental. It’s something that is the froth on the wave. We have this feeling that my consciousness is in charge of doing things, but at best, it’s just aware of what my brain was doing.

        Theories about the brain are very little known by most people. Most people don’t even know how the brain works, whereas Neuroscience of Consciousness is more fundamental than that. Everybody knows what consciousness is; when you wake up in the morning, you’re conscious. We have a lot of neuroscientists now, saying, what is the problem of consciousness? What they mean is, how the way the brain works correlate with what we’re conscious of? It’s a problem for them, they want to explain in materialist terms. It’s got to be material things somehow. Consciousness becomes a mystery when you insist on explaining it in material terms.

          Take consciousness to a much higher level. How do you see consciousness on a grand scale? What sorts of consciousness could there be? Do all consciousness have to be like ours? i mean, are dogs conscious in the same way that we are? Are ants conscious? Very interesting questions. I think they’re real questions which we aren’t able to answer. So, you can ask about Super-Consciousness too.

Cosmic Consciousness

      Could there be a consciousness very much more aware of things than we are? So, could there be one Cosmic Consciousness, which is aware of everything that was going on in the universe? You don’t have to call that God, but if you say, is it possible? well, if you start from saying that consciousness is what is the most obvious and most real thing there is, then it is possible there could be sorts of consciousness which embraced knowledge of everything. You go beyond possible, you believe it to be the case. There actually is such a consciousness; a divine consciousness

             Neuroscience of Consciousness is a first principle. The foundation from which we understand everything. So that, to try to understand consciousness itself makes no sense. I’d like to accept this exaltation of consciousness. What to do with disruptions and disturbances of consciousness? Or multiple personalities? Why such divergence among experts? Is there any common ground? Perhaps the problem lies in confused thinking about consciousness. Could a careful description help?

Unity of Consciousness

      Some scientists argues for the Unity of Consciousness. There are three ways into thinking about what consciousness is. One way in is the use of synonyms, so we can talk about experience, awareness. The problem with the use of synonyms is one can be as puzzled as to what they mean as to what consciousness means.

The second way in is by use of paradigms. We can do that with consciousness, in some sense, by pointing inwards, which is part of the problem because I can only point inwards to my own mind. It’s a little bit harder to point inwards to yours, but one can direct your attention to the features of the world. The sight of red or the smell of cheese? so that was the second.

The third is, you rely on your theory to really tell you the borders of the concept. So, with biological notions like mammal or fish – these are common sense words that we used before the science of biology and zoology really got going, and people would talk about fish or talk about mammals. One get an account of how different forms of life are related to each other, and say, well, given that, it makes sense to use the word fish or these things. Consciousness is really sensory. It’s perceptual; there’s no really, purely, distinctively cognitive consciousness.

The science of consciousness is so immature and there are so many fundamental disputes, so what we need to find are very general properties of consciousness.

       Once we’ve got those, then we’re going to be in a better position to find the underlying theories. Some would say that just indicates you, don’t know what you’re talking about. There’s a fundamental sense in which we don’t know what we’re talking about. We need to be honest. We can still make progress. Of all that we know, consciousness and only consciousness can adjudicate between competing world views.

Is reality entirely physical; the material world all that exists? Or does reality reach to the nonphysical? Do things exist beyond the material world? We can speculate on God, spirits, forces, cosmic residences and such, but Neurosciences of Consciousness differs from these. if consciousness turns out to be purely physical, then, so is everything else. If consciousness were entirely material and, say beliefs were to exist. On consciousness, only my vacillations seems closer to truth.

One Comment

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *