While Understanding SpaceTime; There are 4 dimensions of the universe – three spatial dimensions and one time dimension. With these 4 coordinates, you could rendezvous with anyone anywhere in the universe. In fact these 4 dimensions can describe any event in the universe. But how did time become a dimension. It seems like an odd thing because time is not measured in meters or inches, like the other spatial dimensions.
Basics of Dimensions
Since school time we were 5 best friends. We grew up together and still in contact however it is becoming more and more difficult to meet today because of various social and professional compulsions. But if we want to meet at any possible location on earth, need to give them a precise longitude, latitude, and altitude. Would this be enough information for us to meet? Well, if I show up at that location, there is no guarantee that I meet my friend. Because I missed one more crucial piece of information – The Time.
SpaceTime as Dimension
It is measured in minutes and seconds. It doesn’t seem to fit with the other three. Yet it appears to be a fundamental component of the universe in which we live, as fundamental as the other spatial dimensions. In fact, time is an inseparable component of space. That’s why physicists refer to the geometry of the universe, not as space, but as spacetime.
How did the idea of time as a dimension come about? How can we best visualize these 4 dimensions? And what really happens when space and time start doing seemingly weird things when two objects move relative to each other?
Genesis of SpaceTime
In the late 1800’s, scientists recognized that there was an inconsistency between two theories – Newton’s laws of motion, and Maxwell’s equations describing electricity and magnetism. The problem was the speed of light. Maxwell had shown that light was a propagating wave – a disturbance in the electromagnetic field – a changing electric field continually giving rise to a changing magnetic field which in turn gives rise to a changing electric field again, leading to a self-propagating electromagnetic wave.
Theory predicted what the speed of this wave is, so it predicted the speed of light, which is about 300,000 km/s or 300 million meters per second. The question was what would be the measured speed of light, if the person measuring it was moving, for example, a person moving with the spin of the earth. What would the speed of light be then? According to Newton, this moving observer should measure a different speed, than someone who was not moving.
The measured speed should be the speed of the person, PLUS the speed of light. But Maxwell’s equations seemed to indicate that light has just one speed, C. There was no accounting for a speed of light that was any different than what his equation predicted. Almost every scientist at the time, including Maxwell himself, presumed that Newton was correct, and that Maxwell’s equations were incomplete and needed to be modified.
Measuring the Light
In 1887, two American scientists by the name of Michelson and Morley devised a highly sensitive experiment that could measure the speed of light in the direction of motion of the earth. So the expectation was that the speed would be measured to be “C plus the speed of rotation of the earth”. What they found shocked scientists of the time, because it was totally unexpected.
They found that the speed of light does not vary one iota, due to the motion of the earth. This is one of the most consequential experiments of that last 200 years. A resolution of this unexpected result remained a mystery for over a decade. Henri Poincare came close to solving it, but it was not until Albert Einstein came along and proposed a pretty radical idea at the time, that we got a full resolution.
Einstein’s Picture of Light
Einstein suggested that it was not Maxwell’s equations that needed to be changed, but Newton’s near-sacred laws of motion. He determined that the speed of light does not change in any reference frame, and worked out the crazy implications of this idea.
Einstein showed that observers moving at different speeds will disagree about the distance and time between two events. In other words, they will experience space and time differently. This is the meaning of the “Relative” in Relativity theory. It means that measurements of space and time are relative to the person measuring them.
But the key to understanding this theory is that some things do not change. Namely, the laws of physics, and the speed of light remain the same for everyone. There is very important idea that came out of Einstein’s Theory, that Einstein himself did not first come up with.
It came from German mathematician Hermann Minkowski, who was Einstein’s former professor. He was astonished by his former student’s theory and thought about it deeply, and realized that relativity is really a theory about the geometrical relationship between space and time. He famously said in 1908:
So there are 4 dimensions to specify an event in the universe, three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. The problem is how to visualize 4 dimensions. This is not easy for our three dimensional brains to do. So to make it a little more visually intuitive, we simplify it to 3 dimensions. Two spatial dimensions and one time dimension.
So we eliminate one of the spatial dimensions for simplicity. So what we get is a 3D looking graph, called a Spacetime diagram, where time is depicted in the vertical axis, and the two dimensions of space are depicted on the horizontal axes. The only problem is that time has completely different units than space. So how do we put it on one diagram in a way that is consistent with the other coordinates?
Measuring Time as Length
Minkowski suggested that we can depict time as a length. We simply multiply time by the speed of light. If the speed of light is 300 million meters per second, then we can say that 300 millionths of a second is one meter. It’s just the amount of time that it takes light to travel one meter.
So the time dimension can be expressed in terms of the speed of light times time, or CT. So the vertical axis is labeled CT, which is a length. We can now have 3 consistent coordinates. A non-moving particle would be depicted as a vertical line because it would not be moving in any of the spatial dimensions, but it would be moving forward in time.
Mikowski called this a world line for the particle. A uniformly moving point would be depicted as a diagonal line on this graph because it would be moving in at least one of the spatial coordinates as it is moving forward in time. An accelerating particle would be a curved line.
Geometry of SpaceTime
What would happen if we flashed a light somewhere in this 2D Space. Let’s call this event A. The light would spread in all directions with time. This forms the shape of a cone. So Minkowski called this a Light Cone. Now if a person was standing still and observing the light. There would be a point on this cone where his world line would intersect with the light cone. That would be an event, which we can call event B.
So the light cone really represents all the future events in Spacetime that the light reaches from its initial event A. Similarly, a light cone can be built for any event A in spacetime to show all other future events that are reached by event A. In diagrams one will sometimes see an upside down cone. This is the past light cone, and represents all the past events in spacetime that reach Event A.
Event A can be you here and now. If you were in space at any moment in time, then all the starlight reaching you from all directions would be the past light cone of events reaching you at a particular moment of time, the here and now. And the further out you look, the further back in time you would be looking as well. The points outside these two light cones are causally disconnected from event A, meaning they cannot reach or be reached by event A.
Relativity in SpaceTime
Einstein himself was not keen on this idea initially. He came around later and realized his old professor was indeed on the right track. At this point you might be asking, ok, this if fine. I kind of get it. But how does relativity enter into the picture? How is the idea of different observers in different reference frames, moving at different speeds, affect this light cone?
So let’s visualize again at our light cone and see what happens when the light is not moving from the perspective of a static observer. If I place two light detectors an equal distance apart from the source of the light, then these detectors will detect the light simultaneously.
This is true as long as the objects are not moving. The world lines of the two detectors and the light source are perfectly vertical because they are not moving. However, If the objects are moving from the perspective of the static observer, and we perform the same experiment, then the detection events are no longer simultaneous. This is because the light reaches the two detectors at different times.
Simultaneity is Relative
One detector is moving towards the light, so it detects the light first. The second detector is moving away from the light, so it detects the light later. Note that the light cone remains the same because the speed of light does not change. However, the world lines of these three objects change from the perspective of the static observer. They are tilted towards the direction of movement.
Since one detector is moving closer to the light, it’s detection event will be lower on its worldline than the detector that is moving away from the light, so its detection event will be higher on its world line. Now here is the crucial part, what I have shown you is from the perspective of an observer, Observer A, who is watching from a distance does not move in any of the reference frames.
However, from the perspective of the objects, things are quite different. In other words, if there was an observer B, attached to the objects, such that he was not moving with respect to the objects in any of the reference frames, he would see simultaneous detection by the two light detectors, even though he’s moving with respect to the first observer, observer A.
From observer B’s perspective, he and the objects are static, and it’s observer A that is moving to the left. So the light cone and world lines that Observer B experiences will be straight up, identical to the one seen by observer A when he was not moving with respect to the objects, that is, he sees simultaneous detection. Observer A, however sees the tilted world lines and no simultaneity.
No Absolute Simultaneity in the Universe
So what this shows is that simultaneity is relative. It is relative to the observer. There is no absolute simultaneity in the universe. But each observer sees and experiences exactly the same spacetime. The events are the same. So things can be relative but they are all part of one spacetime. These observers divide space and time in different ways depending on their frame of reference. But ultimately it is one universe, and although simultaneity is relative, they will both agree on causality. Causality is preserved.
I don’t have any overwhelming qualification to write anything. No specific professional studies on the subject and this was the only reason I wanted to write. The questions became haunting voices with one striking thoughts that ‘I have only one life, only one and I can’t live with these questions’. The moment I die, I will get answers to all my questions but wouldn't be able to tell anyone. Then Let's Find Some Answers.....